« MRI2006: Week 15 - Final Week | Main | Rebuttal »

March 6, 2007

MRI2006: Tournament Projection #7

Tournament Projection is through games of Monday, March 5. This does not include Wright State's victory on Tuesday evening.
The upsets are starting to happen.

That is really causing issues with the seedings, especially throwing in a few teams which just last week were on the outside looking in.

Speaking of seedings, I am starting to get some notice from The Bracket Project, now that my site is up to date. One of the big issues this season seems to be the lack of teams from the PAC-10, a conference which was #6, and last, of the power conferences in the MRI. Specifically, the low seeding of Washington State and the missing USC are bringing issue. I will have more comments on that tomorrow, but let's leave you with a thought on Washington State's seeding. There are 337 teams that the MRI ranks in Division 1. Washington State's non-conference SOS of 320th of those 337 teams. How can that at all justify a #3 seed like in Joe Lunardi's bracket?

No matter how well you play in conference, especially one where very few teams are playing tough non-conference schedules, you can't warrant a high seed just by finishing in the top 3 of one of those power conferences.

Ok, more tomorrow on that.

Check out all the seedings in the 7th MRI Tournament Projection.

Teams proceeded by their conference names in all caps are the current MRI leaders of the teams remaining alive in those conferences projected to get one bid.

East Region – East Rutherford, NJ
Winston-Salem, NC
#1North Carolina #16OVC: Eastern Kentucky
#8Nevada #9Kentucky

Spokane, WA
#5Air Force #12BIG SOUTH: Winthrop
#4Davidson #13Michigan

Buffalo, NY
#3Pittsburgh #14MCC: Oral Roberts
#6Butler #11Creighton

Chicago, IL
#7MAC: Akron #10Oregon
#2Wisconsin #15ATLANTIC SUN: Belmont

South Region – San Antonio, TX
New Orleans, LA
#1Texas A&M #16MAAC: Niagara
#8Old Dominion #9Purdue

Sacramento, CA
#5Georgia Tech #12Syracuse
#4Notre Dame #13PATRIOT: Holy Cross

Winston Salem, NC
#3Duke #14AMERICA EAST: Vermont
#6Villanova #11Southern Illinois

New Orleans, LA
#7Illinois #10UNLV
#2Florida #15SUN BELT: North Texas

West Region – San Jose, CA
Lexington, KY
#1Memphis #16Big Sky: Northern Arizona
#8Louisville #9Tennessee

Spokane, WA
#5Arizona #12Florida State
#4Xavier #13Washington State

Columbus, OH
#3Georgetown #14IVY: Pennsylvania
#6Texas #11Virginia Tech

Lexington, KY
#7BYU #10Mississippi State
#2Ohio State #15NORTHEAST: Central Connecticut State

Midwest Region – St. Louis, MO
Chicago, IL
#1Kansas #16play-inSWAC: Mississippi Valley State vs. MEAC: Delaware State
#8Clemson #9Missouri State

Buffalo, NY
#5Virginia Commonwealth #12Connecticut
#4Michigan State #13West Virginia

Columbus, OH
#3Maryland #14SOUTHLAND: Texas A&M-Corpus Christi
#6Marquette #11Gonzaga

Sacramento, CA
#7Indiana #10Massachusetts
#2UCLA #15BIG WEST: Long Beach State


East plays South, West plays Midwest in Final Four

Conferences with multiple bids: Big East (9), ACC (7), Big 10 (7), SEC (4), Pac-10 (4), Big 12 (3), Mountain West (3), MVC (3), Colonial (2), Atlantic 10 (2)

Moved Down for placement requirements: Louisville, UNLV, Connecticut
Moved Up for placement requirements: Akron, Purdue, Southern Illinois

Last 4 At-Large Teams In: Southern Illinois, Michigan, West Virginia, Washington State
Last 4 At-Large Teams Out: Arkansas, Washington, Missouri, Providence

Toughest Region: West (San Jose, CA)
Easiest Region: South (San Antonio, TX)

Copyright 2007 MRISports.com

Ben Miraski writes for MRISports.com and is a featured blogger on FanIQ. Readers can contact Ben at bmiraski@mrisports.com

Posted by bmiraski at March 6, 2007 10:49 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mrisports.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/389

Comments

Davidson as a 4 seed? Washington State on the bubble? Huh? I like differing opinions, but I don't get those at all. Please explain in detail those two seedings.

Posted by: Ian at March 6, 2007 11:44 PM

Nonconference SOS is a factor in deciding seeding, but it is not even close to the most important factor and it should in no way mean that the team is barely in the tournament. Can 30 other brackets be wrong about a team like Washington State (or USC for that matter)? The fact is that they play a very difficult conference schedule, and ended up in second place in a heavily talented Pac-10 conference, over teams like Arizna, Oregon, and USC. The fact that the team's seed in the NCAA Tournament is lower than their ranking in both the AP and Coaches Poll is befuddling. Don't even get me started on USC...

Posted by: Alex at March 7, 2007 12:13 AM

I'm a huge Texas A&M fan, but the Aggies and Memphis with a 1 seed?

Posted by: john at March 7, 2007 9:33 AM

Where's Virginia?

Posted by: Peter H. at March 7, 2007 9:48 AM

BIG 12 has 2 number 1 seeds but only gets 3 teams into the dance. No TT or KSU. Unlikely.

Posted by: DisTex at March 8, 2007 8:48 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)