« About Last Night: Disappointment Edition | Main | MRI 2008 - Rankings Week 6 »
MRI Football 2008 - Rankings Bowl Final
January 10, 2009 | By Benjamin Miraski
The MRI would like to congratulate its 2008-2009 champion, the Florida Gators. Florida cemented its hold on the No. 1 spot in the computer rankings with its 24-14 victory over Oklahoma.
By losing the Sooners fell to third in the rankings, still ahead of a Texas team that is probably still smarting since it beat Oklahoma by the same margin as Florida managed in the championship game.
Moving into the No. 2 position was not Utah as in the AP poll. Instead, it was a USC team that proved itself against Penn State in the Rose Bowl.
The upstart Utes only improved to No. 8 moving ahead of the Alabama Crimson Tide that it beat in the Sugar Bowl.
And for those BCS lovers out there, Virginia Tech also moved up into the rankings... that's the entire rankings since even the ACC winner was unranked after the season ended. The Hokies managed a No. 24 rankings after beating Cincinnati in the Orange Bowl.
The MRI correctly predicted the winner of 21 of the 34 bowl games, a 61.8 percent mark. For the season, the computer predicted 72.92 percent of the games. All-time, the computer has chosen 70.92 percent of the winners.
Check out all the rankings in the bowl final edition of the MRI:
MRI Top 25 Rankings
| Rank | Team | Record | MRI | LW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida | 13-1 | 138.98 | 1 |
| 2 | USC | 12-1 | 130.36 | 3 |
| 3 | Oklahoma | 12-2 | 126.07 | 2 |
| 4 | Texas | 12-1 | 119.50 | 4 |
| 5 | Penn State | 11-2 | 108.40 | 5 |
| 6 | TCU | 11-2 | 96.54 | 7 |
| 7 | ![]() Boise State | 12-1 | 92.46 | 6 |
| 8 | Utah | 13-0 | 92.43 | 10 |
| 9 | Alabama | 12-2 | 87.42 | 8 |
| 10 | Ohio State | 10-3 | 80.65 | 9 |
| 11 | Tulsa | 11-3 | 79.68 | 14 |
| 12 | Texas Tech | 11-2 | 76.05 | 11 |
| 13 | Oregon | 10-3 | 75.05 | 12 |
| 14 | Missouri | 10-4 | 67.77 | 13 |
| 15 | Georgia | 10-3 | 66.18 | 19 |
| 16 | Cal | 9-4 | 66.07 | 18 |
| 17 | Iowa | 9-4 | 65.92 | 17 |
| 18 | Oregon State | 9-4 | 59.88 | 21 |
| 19 | Arizona | 8-5 | 59.00 | 22 |
| 20 | Oklahoma State | 9-4 | 56.91 | 16 |
| 21 | Mississippi | 9-4 | 56.14 | 23 |
| 22 | BYU | 10-3 | 56.02 | 20 |
| 23 | Florida State | 9-4 | 55.68 | NR(29) |
| 24 | Virginia Tech | 10-4 | 52.84 | NR(30) |
| 25 | Ball State | 12-2 | 51.65 | 15 |
Teams Dropped From The Top 25: Pittsburgh (LW #24, TW #27), Troy (LW #25, TW #31)
Other Teams People Might Care About
| Rank | Team | Record | MRI | LW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | Pittsburgh | 9-4 | 50.68 | 24 |
| 36 | Boston College | 9-5 | 43.78 | 34 |
| 37 | Michigan State | 9-4 | 43.73 | 27 |
| 40 | LSU | 8-5 | 41.19 | 54 |
| 47 | Georgia Tech | 9-4 | 34.85 | 31 |
| 48 | Notre Dame | 7-6 | 34.51 | 57 |
| 49 | Clemson | 7-6 | 34.00 | 46 |
| 51 | Northwestern | 9-4 | 32.89 | 48 |
| 52 | Vanderbilt | 7-6 | 31.89 | 58 |
| 53 | Tennessee | 5-7 | 31.67 | 55 |
| 54 | Wisconsin | 7-6 | 30.10 | 40 |
| 57 | Northern Illinois | 6-7 | 27.64 | 53 |
| 60 | Miami | 7-6 | 24.67 | 60 |
| 62 | Illinois | 5-7 | 23.18 | 61 |
| 67 | Auburn | 5-7 | 17.81 | 68 |
| 70 | Maryland | 8-5 | 15.55 | 75 |
| 80 | Purdue | 4-8 | 8.25 | 79 |
| 88 | Duke | 4-8 | -2.17 | 87 |
| 94 | UCLA | 4-8 | -9.03 | 95 |
| 95 | Michigan | 3-9 | -9.82 | 91 |
| 104 | Texas A&M | 4-8 | -22.44 | 102 |
| 112 | Indiana | 3-9 | -43.94 | 112 |
| 115 | Miami(Ohio) | 2-10 | -51.18 | 114 |
| 119 | Washington State | 2-11 | -83.74 | 119 |
Last Place this week: North Texas (1-11) at -87.61. 4th week in a row.
Biggest Gain this week: Tulsa gained 15.76 points. (Beat Ball State in the GMAC Bowl (45-13))
Biggest Loss this week: Ball State lost 11.33 points (Lost to Tulsa in the GMAC Bowl (13-45))
Conference rankings this week: SEC, Big 12, Big Ten, Big East, ACC, PAC-10, Mountain West, C-USA, WAC, MAC, Sun Belt
Conference rankings this week: SEC, Big 12, Big Ten, Big East, ACC, PAC-10, Mountain West, C-USA, WAC, MAC, Sun Belt
The MRI Rankings are copyright 2008 by MRISports.com. Ben Miraski is a reporter for the Medill News Service, edits and writes for MRISports.com and is a featured blogger on FanIQ. Readers can contact Ben at bmiraski@mrisports.com
Posted January 10, 2009 1:03 PM
Comments
To avoid spam we require you to log in to comment. Simply use your Facebook, Google or Yahoo login to verify you aren't a robot and post your thoughts on the site.
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

