March 24, 2006

Tournament Musings: Sweet 16 Friday

I am still trying to catch my breath. The highlights keep rolling on ESPN, repeatedly showing the last few seconds of the final two games from Thursday.

Kenton Paulino deftly catching the pass from AJ Abrams with his left hand and in one motion stopping his rush up the court and jumping from about three feet beyond the arc. Swish! Game over. Texas advances.

Jordan Farmar steals the ball from over JP Batista's head in the back court and tosses it to Luc Richard Mbah a Moute for an easy two points. Derek Raivio rushes up the court with the ball, harassed by the UCLA defense. The ball is knocked from him and Mbah a Moute dives to the floor to cover it up forcing the tie-up. Arron Afflalo manages to hit one free throw after getting fouled on the inbounds pass, keeping hope for the Zags alive. Gonzaga has one last heave down court to Batista. Clunk! Game over. UCLA survives and Adam Morrison collapses to the floor in tears.

Within about the game space of about a minutes, two No. 2 seeds survive what were amazing games.

Not to take anything away from the earlier two contests, but the second two were games that rival the finishes of last season's Regional Finals. And there is no reason to suspect that they won't lead to great games on Saturday making us recall last year's games once again.

So, with Thursday's games done and Saturday's games set, the MRI takes a look at Friday's schedule and who should still be playing on Sunday afternoon.

Washington Region: George Mason (11) vs. Wichita State (7)
Unless you have been sleeping for the last week, you have heard all there is to know about both George Mason and Wichita State. You have watched how these two teams that many didn't give a chance have advanced to be on the verge of making history. Not that history hasn't already been made. The Colonial Athletic Association doesn't put teams into the Sweet 16. The Missouri Valley doesn't put two teams into the Sweet 16. But the basketball landscape is changing, and these are the pioneers of that change.

And the Pioneers of George Mason might have the best shot to make history of the two teams. Earlier this season, Tony Skinn nailed a three point shot to beat Wichita State. And now he has another chance. Skinn was suspended for the opening round game against Michigan State. His team fought to the win.

Skinn's game against North Carolina was forgettable, but not the result -- another win for the Patriots. And now, Skinn has the chance to relive the glory of the earlier game when he scored 23 points against the Shockers.

The battle inside between Jai Lewis of George Mason and Paul Miller and Kyle Wilson of Wichita State will be something to watch. Lewis may not have shot well against the athletic Tyler Hansbrough, but his 275 pounds sure disrupted the North Carolina big man. Miller and Wilson have dominated the inside in their games against Seton Hall and Tennessee. Last time around, they had trouble containing Lewis. They must be better prepared now.

And George Mason better be prepared for the shooting talent of Wichita State. Sean Ogirri took a while to get going against Tennessee, but he was key to the first victory over Seton Hall. PJ Couisnard took over in the Tennessee game with two late three point baskets to seal the win. Both will need to shoot better than last time around when they were 2-11 from three point range. Given the way things have gone so far in the tournament, that stat should definitely improve.

This one is almost too close to call, which should be obvious after the close result of the Bracket Buster game. Given the tougher road that George Mason has taken to this point and the game's location in D.C., I am going to lean towards the Patriots, but there is no reason that the game can't go the other way. Most of the country will dismiss this game because of the names in it, but it should provide some of the best action of the night.
MRI Predicts: George Mason Confidence factor: 59.89%

Washington Region: Connecticut (1) vs. Washington (5)
Connecticut, against everyone's predictions, has stumbled into the Sweet Sixteen. Not that anyone thought that Connecticut would be home by now. It was more that they thought they would easily blow through the competition until this point. That wasn't the truth as they struggled against the #16 Albany and then against Kentucky. Now they have a rolling Washington team that wasn't expected at all to be in this game.

The Huskies were discounted by everyone, with some going so far to believe that Utah State would be playing against Illinois in the second round. Brandon Roy and Washington survived though, living through repeated comebacks by Illinois and now they have to take down the East coast Huskies.

Roy has now scored almost 50 points in the first two contests which is good for Washington and bad for them also. Good because it means their best player is rolling into the game with Connecticut on a hot streak. Bad because it means that Washington isn't getting a contribution from anyone else to help spread the Connecticut defense out.

Yes, Justin Dentmon and Jamaal Williams have been contributing, but just not in the surprising way that you look for in the tournament. They haven't led the team in scoring. They haven't come from nowhere to become the next great name. They are in the shadows of Roy and that means that Connecticut should have one singular focus -- stopping him.

Connecticut's defense is the best in the league when they are concentrating. Hilton Armstrong was the easy choice for the Defensive Player of the Year in the Big East. He swats away anything that comes even close to him. In the Kentucky game, the blocks weren't coming, but if a scare doesn't get the defense focused for Washington, I don't know what will. And even if Armstrong is out, Josh Boone, Rudy Gay, and Denham Brown will be patrolling around the basket with one of the deepest big lines in the country.

The key in this game will be focus. There is no doubt that Connecticut can stop the scoring of Washington if they are into the game. And if Marcus Williams is playing as well as he has been lately, and Rashad Anderson can add his very timely threes, Connecticut should be unstoppable with all their weapons.

I just don't see Washington pulling another upset to get past the Huskies. Connecticut should roll into Sunday.
MRI Predicts: Connecticut Confidence factor: 67.74%

Minneapolis Region: Villanova (1) vs. Boston College (4)
Craig Smith and Jared Dudley are going to have a field day inside against the Wildcats. Seems like an obvious statement. Too bad it won't be true. Arizona thought it was going to have that field day and look what happened to them. The four guard line-up that the Philadelphia Wildcats had been dragging out to the court all season suddenly wasn't the story. Instead it was Will Sheridan and Dante Cunningham. The two big men in the eternally small line-up were contributing more than they had ever been needed before. And it paid off for Villanova. They are still playing.

Sheridan and Cunningham will need to give little bit more if Villanova is to keep playing until Sunday. Their guards will score. Their guards will defend Louis Hinnant and Tyrese Rice. They just need the big men to do their job inside. It is that simple. Villanova is too strong around the perimeter for that to be a factor. Boston College is going to need to get the ball into the post. And the amount that they are able to do that will determine if the Eagles will be soaring Sunday, or if they will only be soaring back to Massachusetts.

Randy Foye and Allan Ray will most likely go for about 50 points combined in this one. Their mid-range shooting will be called into action here. They won't be able to drive to the basket in this game. If West Virginia can live by shooting from deep, then Villanova will have to live by shooting from 15 feet. If Boston College can keep the Wildcats under 70, they may have a chance in this one. Otherwise, they are going home.
MRI Predicts: Villanova Confidence factor: 72.77%

Minnesapolis Region: Georgetown (7) vs. Florida (3)
If you like to watch the big men battle it out inside the paint, this game is for you. And this one should be simple for the Gators in terms of strategy. Wear out Roy Hibbert. The Georgetown big man is carrying around almost 300 pounds. And no one runs like the Gators.

Billy Donovan has always had fast teams, but not many have been this fast and this big. His bench is deep with big men that he can trot out against Hibbert. It won't be two men and done like Ohio State. It won't be outmatched inside like Northern Iowa. This is team that has the size to compete with Georgetown's version of the Great Wall of China.

The Gators will also need to get the contribution from Taurean Green, something that has been lacking during the first two rounds. The announcers from CBS made it clear. Green had been walking through the first two games in a daze. Flashes of brilliance, yes, but a daze for the better part of the tournament so far. They haven't exactly needed him so far. The fast big men like Joakim Noah have made sure to cover for the back court leader. However, with their hands full in this one, they are going to need Green's contribution on the shooting front. Only 14 points in the first two games combined for a player that almost averages 14 a game for the Gators won't be enough for Florida.

Of course, if Hibbert is forced to foul and foul early against Noah et al, Green might not be needed. The Florida front line can easily take it inside against Georgetown's Jeff Green and Brandon Bowman. Not that these Hoyas aren't great defenders. It is that they improve when the offense of the other team has to worry about the seven footer in the middle in addition to them.

So there is the plan for Florida, a team running right now like a freight train with no conductor and no dead man's switch. Keep running. Wear out Hibbert. The rest should take care of itself.
MRI Predicts: Florida Confidence factor: 79.14%

Posted by bmiraski at 1:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 23, 2006

Tournament Musings: Sweet 16 Thursday

8 games, two days, getting us to what last year was the most exciting two days of the season.

Not to take anything away from the championship game last year, or the Final Four, but it was all downhill after the Regional Finals.

So who is going to make it to the Regional Finals this year and try to live up to last year's buzzer beaters, comebacks and shockers?

Let's see what the MRI has to say about Thursday's games.

Atlanta Regional: Duke(1) vs. LSU(4)
The further that Duke goes in the tournament, the more dangerous they normally get. This year, that is a little scary. The Blue Devils certainly seemed to have some weaknesses late in the season. JJ Redick's shooting was going downhill earlier that usual. Shelden Williams seemed to not have any help inside despite the improving play of DeMarcus Nelson and Josh McRoberts. And then the ACC tournament hit and all that trouble went out the window. Their play improved, Redick shooting came back, Williams was the landlord of the paint once again. This has carried over into the NCAA tournament and they are winning their games by the second largest margin in the field. And yet, it still scares me to see this team, this team with so many acknowledged flaws, ready to make another run to the Final Four.

Add to my fears that they are playing a dangerous young team in LSU. The Tigers are showing everyone why I think they are ready to make a Final Four run next season. Their margin of victory hasn't been that impressive. They aren't blowing people away in the tournament. They are winning with good shooting and a great inside game led by Glen Davis.

Despite all that, I think that the experience of the Blue Devils will win out out in this game. Williams has grown enough over his four years to learn how to be tough inside without being in foul trouble all the time. McRoberts is turning into the good inside player that Coach Krzyzewski recruited. He should provide enough help to Williams whether they are sharing the court or he is subbing for him. This should be enough to take away the advantage that Davis has provided LSU inside. The X-factor will be the shooting of Greg Paulus and Redick, who have both done much better over the two games of the tournament. It must be a relief for Redick that he no longer has to carry the shooting load outside of the paint by himself.

Duke is turning into an actual team as opposed to two players with a supporting cast as they were for most of the season.

Count this one for the Devils, though it will probably be a lot closer than Duke's other games so far and most people expect.
MRI Predicts: Duke Confidence factor: 72.82%

Atlanta Regional: West Virginia (6) vs. Texas (2)
They played earlier this year. Texas played terribly for most of the game, turning the ball over too much, missing open shots, but they were still in it. And when you are close with the game on the line, it should be up to your best player to do something to take it over the top and LaMarcus Aldridge did just that. Aldridge made a shot with 3.9 seconds remaining and then scored a big block to save the game for the Longhorns.

And that was early in the season. Texas didn't look like the team they are now. This team doesn't give the ball up 24 times. This is not the team that Duke sent to the showers with a 31-point defeat. This is a team that has come into its own.

I keep talking about the importance of Brad Buckman. Remember, it was he who was missing for most of the game against Duke. Before he left the floor, the game was close. After he was gone, Texas had nothing. He only scores nine a game. He only gets about seven rebounds. He isn't flashy, but he is a complement to Aldridge on the floor. Buckman helps to clear the other team's big men out of the inside to give more room to Aldridge to work. Unlike most teams that have only one larger man to set screens up high, or in the post, Texas has two. They don't lose the lane when Buckman moves up to the top of the key to give the guards a little room. They still have Aldridge in the paint to receive a pass for the easy lay-in.

That said, Buckman is not the only key to this game, but he is a big part especially against the undersized West Virginia. Kenton Paulino will need to make his passes, Aldridge will need to make his shots, Daniel Gibson will need to add his almost 14 points a game.

Texas is built to beat a team like West Virginia. They have the big presence inside. If the Mountaineers can only get one chance at a longer shot, Texas will control the ball for long periods of time. Their guards are pesky enough to force West Virginia into turnovers.

The line from last game had Mike Gansey scoring 28 points. The rest of the team had only one man over 10. I have to believe a focus of the defensive effort for Texas is going to be stopping Gansey from doing it again. PJ Tucker will most likely be outside to try and stop the smaller forward. If Buckman and Aldridge can stay home, Gansey won't be driving past Tucker to get to the rim.

Texas has to force West Virginia to shoot long shots and not allow the offensive rebounds. Yes, a good number of the shots will fall in, but the secret will be keeping West Virginia from the long boards.

If Texas can do that, as they did last time, and not allow Gibson to turn the ball over nine times, this game should go the Longhorns' way much easier than the previous match.
MRI Predicts: Texas Confidence factor: 92.45%

Oakland Regional: Memphis (1) vs. Bradley (13)
When I told you a few weeks ago that Marcellus Sommerville's college career story was yet to be written, you probably didn't believe me. When I recommended that you might want to take a shot on Bradley in the first round against Kansas, I am guessing many of you left it out of your brackets.

When Bradley won their first two games of the NCAA tournament, I am guessing many of you were still shocked.

The truth is that Bradley has a very good basketball team, underrated, and under-seeded by the committee. This team proved over the last third of the season that they were just as good if not better than the most of the Missouri Valley conference. And now they have a chance to shock the country again if they can beat the Memphis Tigers.

According to the MRI numbers, the chance of Bradley winning back to back games against Kansas and Pittsburgh when they did, on a neutral floor, was something close to 1 in 15. The chances of them beating Kansas, Pittsburgh, and Memphis, in a row is less than 1 in 100. And yet, you still can't count them out.

They are bringing in Sommerville, who has averaged 19 points in the last two games. They have Patrick O'Bryant, who sure made a name for himself against Pittsburgh, averaging 18 points and 9 rebounds. It is not as if they were doing this against poor competition either. It is probably a given that these two can do well for the Braves. The real question will be what other member of the team steps up to shoot along with them.

In the game against Kansas, it was Daniel Ruffin and Will Franklin. Against Pittsburgh, it was Lawrence Wright. This team has the talent to compete. But can they stop the Tigers?

Memphis won't allow them to get away with turnovers. They will run over them too quickly if that happens. Memphis is too fast in the transition game for Bradley to keep up with them long in a running match.

While the Tigers may not be as tall inside as Bradley, Rodney Carney is also no slouch when it comes to scoring inside or out. There is a good chance Sommerville will get the task of guarding Carney and that could signal a quick foul problem for Bradley. Carney has too much speed for Sommerville to match up consistently with him and it could be that we see him driving past Sommerville every chance he gets. This means that O'Bryant will either have to come off his man to help, leaving open the easy pass and basket, or Sommerville is going to get caught trying to keep up and be forced to foul Carney or give the easy hoop.

While I can't totally discount the Braves, they are overwhelmed by the talent on Memphis and that should be enough to give the Tigers the edge. The speed of Memphis combined with the chance for Bradley to make too many mistakes now that the eyes of the nation are on them should be too much. There is no counting on foul trouble from all the Memphis big men as there was in the game against Pittsburgh. There won't be the turnovers to give the ball back to Bradley consistently as there was against Kansas. John Calipari won't let that happen.

Still, something in the back of my head still tells me that a story is coming here, despite what the numbers say. Don't be surprised if Memphis is the first No.1 seed to go down, and Bradley is the first No. 13 seed to play for a chance to go to the Final Four.
MRI Predicts: Memphis Confidence factor: 85.85%

Oakland Regional: Gonzaga (3) vs. UCLA (2)
If you aren't already exhausted from watching the Duke and LSU game, this one should be a treat, if only to see which way UCLA is able to shut down Gonzaga.

The Zags have been lucky so far. They survived Xavier, though I think it shocked them that they were pushed to the limit by that team. They survived Indiana, despite Morrison's dreadful shooting night and Vaden's 20 points. They won't be so lucky with UCLA.

I should apologize for telling people to overlook Indiana in the first round. I was unaware that Vaden would be playing. And wouldn't you know that it would be his three point shot with about three seconds to go that would do in the Aztecs for good. And I really thought that San Diego State would have what it took to take out Gonzaga in the second round for another season. Well, so much for that pick.

So, we will be putting our faith in the Bruins to do the task and it shouldn't be a surprise when they do.

I have consistently railed on the need to not stop Adam Morrison, because only he can stop himself, as he has a few times this year. His shooting wasn't on against Indiana and it may have something to do with a flu bug that he has caught and may not have shaken by the time the game begins tonight. The real secret to stopping the Zags is in making sure they have no second option.

There is no doubt in my mind that Jordan Farmar can stop Derek Raivio. That means that this battle, like most in the tournament will be won with the inside game. Can Luc Mbah a Moute, Ryan Hollins, and Alfred Aboya, stop JP Batista? The answer here is a resounding yes.

Xavier's bigger team held him to 18 points, and only eight rebounds. UCLA's big men are better.

Indiana let Batista get 20, and let Sean Mallon total 15 on them. They didn't have the help for Marco Killingsworth that UCLA does.

And yet despite their deficiencies, both Xavier and Indiana both just missed beating the Zags. UCLA, on paper, should have better luck against Batista, and given Morrison's health, potentially both of them.

Arron Afflalo has been semi-silent through the tournament so far. I would look for him to take advantage of Adam Morrison's less that spectacular defense in this game and start to come alive for the Bruins. He better do it now, as they will need him against Memphis in the Regional Finals.
MRI Predicts: UCLA Confidence factor: 72.82%

Posted by bmiraski at 12:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

March 15, 2006

Tournament Musings: Lines 5 through 8

Now that you have the inside track on the top lines in the bracket, what are you going to do on the tough match-ups, the games anywhere from the 5-12 to the 8-9. We all know there are some trends but what do the rules from the first part tell us about the other games?

Let's keep looking at that first round.

The five seeds are what we all know as legend. They always go down to the No. 12, usually once or more per tournament. So which No. 5 is in trouble this year? Well, it is not Pittsburgh, despite how down I was on the Panthers going into the Big East tournament. Their performance through the gauntlet in that mini-NCAA type tournament was definitely enough to let me know that they are ready. And not only ready, possibly poised for a long run into the tournament. I would imagine that Pittsburgh has what it takes to beat not only Kansas, thanks to the Jayhawks youth, but also the Memphis Tigers. All seven feet and 270 pounds of Aaron Gray are going to give teams coming into the middle plenty of trouble. Plus, between Gray and Carl Krauser, Pitt has the scoring ability to hang with anyone. The only issue for the Panthers is depth and while it won't kill them in the first round, later rounds are going to be an issue. Kansas could go down to Pitt and so might Pittsburgh, but UCLA will be much tougher.

While you are at it, you can move Washington through. Utah State was one of the MRI misses, and thanks to the rules, MRI misses are more than likely to lose in the first round. Very few get past that point at all, and even fewer are going to make any run to the Sweet 16. The only two teams to embarrass the MRI completely were Missouri a few years back and West Virginia last season. That pretty much guarantees that Utah State is a first round loss.

Nevada doesn't play an MRI miss - the MRI actually had Montana over Northern Arizona for the Big Sky title - but it does have Nick Fazekas and Montana doesn't. The big man in the middle for the Wolf Pack has great help along the perimeter and inside. Nevada is also a sleeper pick for the Sweet 16. Look for them to challenge Boston College with the same make-up as the Eagles. Don't be surprised if Nevada can duplicate the run it had under Trent Johnson.

So, that leaves everyone's Big East tournament Cinderella, Syracuse. Can I be serious? The Orange going down to one of the last teams in, Texas A&M? Yes. Syracuse's run in the tournament came with a lot of luck. They needed a few saves from Gerry McNamara and it could be that they have used up all of their magic to get to this point. Don't forget that they also played 4 games last week against very good competition. It is not like they are rested for the start of the tournament and the tiredness did show a bit at the end of their Big East run. So can Texas A&M end it all for the Orange? Yes. A&M had been playing better than most teams headed into their Big XII tournament. They humiliated Colorado and they gave Texas everything they had for the second time in two weeks to continue their life in tournament. There is no doubt that the Aggies can play with anyone. The real question will be if it carries over into the NCAA tournament and I think the answer is yes. I don't think the Orange are going to have what it takes to slow down Acie Law and the defense of the Aggies has been very good over the past few weeks. And all that will lead them to the first round upset.

At the 6-seed, we have two more automatic exits thanks to MRI misses. Indiana is going to try and send Mike Davis out a winner, much to the chagrin of the administration, but I don't think it will happen. Possibly without Robert Vaden, they are going to be without one of their top scoring threats and that is not something you want in the tournament. San Diego State has Marcus Slaughter inside to help shut down Marco Killingsworth and that should give the Aztecs enough of an edge on the defensive side of the ball to score with the Hoosiers. As long as nothing happens to Slaughter to cause him to miss too much of the game, they should pull the win. And don't think that San Diego State will stop there. Given their roster, they should prove a tough test for Gonzaga should the Zags get past the larger Xavier team.

The other 6-seed without hope is West Virginia. Yes, I would have said that last season also, but this year I mean it. I have said before that any team with a decent inside presence and some great guard defense has a great chance of stopping the Mountaineers. I think Southern Illinois has enough of that to stop the 3-point shots from raining down on them. Everyone loved Pittsnogle last season. This year, they will lament selecting him deep into the tournament bracket.

Michigan State should move through a little easier. While George Mason got a lot of love in the MRI this season, they will be without their second leading scorer who is suspended for the game.

And that leaves Oklahoma. The Sooners haven't been playing well lately, but Wisconsin-Milwaukee won't be making the run that they did either. Taj Gray and Kevin Bookout should be too much for the Panthers to deal with inside and that should keep Wisconsin-Milwaukee only playing one game this year.

So, if the six line was so easy, is the seven line the same way? Well part of it is. Both Cal and Marquette were teams that the MRI didn't pick. I think that Cal is definitely out in the first round. They have only one weapon and watching how easily UCLA took care of them, I can't be convinced that they will be going on to the weekend. Meanwhile, Marquette is a different story.

The Golden Eagles will be playing Alabama, another of the MRI's misses, much as the committee plans it each season. So, despite all of the critics I have faced, take Marquette. Steve Novak should be too much for Alabama, and considering that 'Bama has been playing even worse than Oklahoma over the last few weeks, it should be an easy win. They meet UCLA most likely in round two, so they better enjoy the 40 minutes they have against the Tide. They won't be getting past the Bruins.

The other two games should be of great interest as we will find out a lot about the top teams in the Missouri Valley. Wichita State is the only team from the Valley to get a high seed in the tournament and that has often been good news for that conference. And they are playing an MRI miss. What more could you want? The Shockers have a balanced scoring attack and don't need to rely on only a few players to get the production they need. I have Wichita State moving past Seton Hall, and then, no matter if Winthrop pulls the upset or not, the Shockers will keep playing all the way to the second weekend. Sweet sixteen has never been so good as when it comes to rub it into the face of all the naysayers of the Valley out there.

Northern Iowa did not get as lucky with its draw. Ben Jacobson and Grant Stout will have their hands full with the Georgetown Hoyas. Roy Hibbert is a monster inside for the Hoyas. He is listed at 7'2" and 283 pounds. That is a lot for a team that doesn't have a player over 6'10" to move around. And that player doesn't even start. Plus, the newest version of the Princeton offense with a little more style is not like anything in the Missouri Valley. The Hoyas should take this, but I would expect this game to be tightly contested. Either way, this winner is not getting past the Buckeyes in the second round, no matter how big they are.

And now for the fun lines, the 8-9 game. This is more often won by the No. 9 team and this year should be no different. The only No. 8 team I would count on is George Washington. It looks like Pops Mensah-Bonsu will be playing and that is not good for the Colonial conference champs, UNC-Wilmington. The Colonial Athletic Association was hoping to make a statement in the tournament this year. They were hoping to show that they had what it takes to warrant two bids each season. They certainly had the numbers during the regular season. But they don't have a Pops and that will keep their tournament to only 40 minutes.

Now the No. 9 seeds. I don't know about you, but Bucknell is too good to pass up. They won last year against a much better Kansas squad and no matter how good Arkansas had been playing of late to show the committee what I had been saying for two months, you have to go with the Bison. Bucknell earned a spot in the MRI top 25 before the season was done and that should be enough for me to pick them in this game. But also to remember is that this team took down Syracuse this season. They have their veteran line-up returning and they have the experience of winning the game. Arkansas... not so much.

If you want to talk about experience, there are no two better teams to talk about than Wisconsin and Arizona. Ever since the revival at Wisconsin about 10 years ago, the Badgers have been a staple of the tournament. And Arizona, they have been there for almost as long as Lute Olson has been coaching. The Wildcats had some trouble this year. Having one of the toughest schedules in the league, they definitely had their share of struggles. And off the court, they had plenty of distractions to keep them occupied also. I don't think this team has the focus this year for a deep run. Too much has happened to them this year.

Wisconsin may not be playing their best basketball either, but they always seem to find a way to turn it on in the tournament. The Badgers have the one of the best inside games and they should not have a problem out rebounding Arizona. They will need to control the tempo and keep it very slow. If the Wildcats run out on them, they will need one of the Illinois style comebacks from last year's tournament to get to the second round. I think they have the shooters to do it, but that is not how they like to play. I have the Badgers surprising a lot of people thanks to their superior match-up against not only Arizona, but Villanova (lack of big men), and Nevada (too much size over the Wolf Pack). Will Wisconsin make the great run? I think so, and it will be another banner year for the Big Ten if they do, facing Ohio State in the Regional Finals.

One last first round game: UAB against Kentucky. UAB knows how to play defense and that should be enough in this game to take out the Wildcats. Why? Because Kentucky can not hang onto the ball. No matter what line-up that Tubby Smith will put into the game, they just have trouble with keeping the ball with the shirts in blue. By now we all know Squeaky Johnson's name. He averages almost 3 steals a game. There isn't much more you can say about that. The Blazers need to concentrate on not only forcing the turnovers but keeping the ball away from the Randolph Morris. If UAB can accomplish that, much as they have all season, they will take out the inconsistent Kentucky team.

There is your first round with a little glimpse into what I did later in the brackets. If all holds true, the winner of the tournament will most likely come from the top 10 teams in the MRI. That means no Iowa, no UCLA (though I like them as a sleeper), no Ohio State, and most definitely no Gonzaga.

This is a very interesting tournament and one of the hardest ones that I have yet tried to pick my way through. Once the tournament begins, I will post a link to my brackets somewhere on a website so you can follow my progress and that of the MRI through the rounds. Enjoy the games and enjoy the dance.

Posted by bmiraski at 10:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

March 14, 2006

Tournament Musings: The Rules and the Top 4 lines

People think that just because I have a rating system, I always pick the games strictly according to the numbers.

Some of that is true, but a lot of that is not. The best brackets I have always have a bit of knowledge soaked into them to complement the numbers.

So what is that knowledge? I'll tell you. Let's look at the 2006 bracket and make some picks.

First things first. Place the No. 1 seed in every region into the second round. This isn't the year things are going to change, not with the 1-seeds that we have and the lack of strength in the 16-seeds. If this one fails you, you are free to send me your requests for your entry fee back in whatever pool you are in.

Now, we are getting to the first bit of knowledge. Each year, no matter what, there is always one region that goes crazy. Every rule you have ever heard for filling out your bracket fails in that region. It is as if the laws of physics don't apply anymore just for teams in that regional. Now that the "pod system" is in place, you could even have one set of teams at a first round location follow all the rules, while the other set just seems to be playing under a cloud. This year, I think this will be in the Minneapolis region. There are too many really good teams there for the region to hold true to form.

The next bit of knowledge is that you must have a strong big man to help carry your team through the games. The tournament is about stamina, and a team that is busy trying to travel and shoot and live up to media expectations is not going to survive long. That is why last year's West Virginia team is still such a shocker. They did most of their damage from behind the three point arc. Does that mean that a shooting team can't win a game or two? No, of course not. In fact, that is the other piece of the game that you have to have in place.

You can't just throw the ball inside to the big guy and hope that he will win you the ball game. You have to have the shooters who can get you the big three, or have the ability to receive the kick back from the centers and forwards and knock down the open jumper. Syracuse had Carmelo Anthony, and even more now, Gerry McNamara, UConn had Ben Gordon, and North Carolina had just about everyone else on their team other than Sean May.

Right now, you are probably thinking, "Great. Tell me something I didn't know." Well, if you knew it then why are you picking Boston College to go far? How about the same West Virginia team from last year, again in this year's tournament? The fact is, you have to look for balanced teams to fill the deep lines on your brackets. That is where the money is, not that we advocate gambling at all.

So, these are the criteria we are going to look at in the tournament games.

Got your pencils ready? Good.

We already talked about the No. 1 seeds. They aren't going to lose.

The No. 2 seeds need a little bit of analysis though. Not all of them. Just one. Tennessee.

Yes, I know ESPN is hyping up Bruce Pearl's team because Pearl is using the backlash over his team's placement as blackboard material. Uh, Bruce, last time I checked, the No. 2 seed didn't need blackboard material, at least to get out of the first round. Maybe later in the tournament, but not right away. Are you telling us you are scared? Well he should be, because he is facing Winthrop.

Here come the screams. "Winthrop? The 15-seed? We should be scared?" I know. They barely survived the conference tournament final against Coastal Carolina, a team they lost to twice this season. And they lost to Liberty during the regular season, a loss that they avenged by beating the Flames by 41 in the Big South Tournament. But against tournament teams, they performed a lot better. They beat Marquette on the road early in the season in a shocker. They barely lost to Alabama, the team that Marquette will be playing the first round. They were only 10 points away from the #1 seeded Memphis Tigers, and while I hate to bring up past tournament performance (Nantz and Packer, pay attention), Winthrop gave Gonzaga every thing they had last season in the first round before falling by 10.

The Eagles have the right amount of size inside, including 6'10" Craig Bradshaw to go up against Tennessee. The only question will be around speed. If the Vols can run the ball like they have in their meetings with Florida, the Eagles will tire quickly and be done. However, I still think that Winthrop has the right combination to pull off the upset in this one, especially since the Eagles may be seeded too low and the Vols too high. If this were a 4-13 game, I would say to pencil in the Eagles. The 2-15 match-up scares me, if only for the numbers next to the names. I don't think that the Vols have enough depth on the inside to go far in the tournament. They are going to have to rely on running and shooting and keeping Major Wingate and Andre Patterson out of foul trouble. One game could be easy to pull over on them. If you want to take the chance and your pool has any points based on seed of the winner, pick the upset. You won't be hurting for long if you are wrong.

Moving to the 3-14 match-ups, I am pretty confident that these will hold form also. In fact, three of these names will be coming up a lot as we move forward through the bracket -- Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida.

Yes, I know that Steve Alford hasn't exactly had Iowa ready to shock anyone in the tournament in the past, but then again, they have never been the three seed under him either. The Hawkeyes have the recipe for a big tournament run, just like most Big Ten teams and this year, and they have the depth to finally pull it off. They will not be the underdog after the first game either like their were the last time they won a game in the tournament. I would venture that of all the teams on the three line, Iowa matches up the best with both teams seeded above them, Texas and Duke.

North Carolina is young, but there are still players on that team that experienced the Championship season last year. Every team is going to have its bobble game in the tournament. This is the game that is way too close and scares every amateur bracket maker until the final buzzer. North Carolina will have theirs early and after that, they should be a scary team. Once they learned how to win at the beginning of the season, considering many of them didn't have many minutes or points at the college level, there was very little that stood in their way, including Duke.

We will get to Florida later, but South Alabama should not pull the shocker. That much I can be sure of.

The only question mark is Gonzaga. The Zags have enough questions around them to fill an entire article. The most interesting part about Gonzaga is that ever since they have become a favorite, they haven't made the Sweet Sixteen. The first two years of their current run in the tournament were all made from the bottom part of the bracket. As soon as the number were next to their name during the season, at some points putting them as high as #4 or 5 in the nation this season, expectations seemed to take away their chances. And this is probably their most dicey year yet with the high seed.

If you look at the previous years for Gonzaga, you can see the pattern even more.

  • 1998-9 Pre-MRI, Get #10 seed, Make Elite 8 before losing to Connecticut
  • 1999-2000 Pre-MRI, Get #10 seed, Make Sweet 16 before losing to Purdue
  • 2000-1 #41 MRI pre-tournament, Get #12 seed, Make Sweet 16 before losing to Michigan State
  • 2001-2 #11 MRI pre-tournament, Get #6 seed, Lose first round to Wyoming (They did get hosed on seeding this year)
  • 2002-3 #23 MRI pre-tournament, Get #9 seed, Lose second round to Arizona
  • 2003-4 #3 MRI pre-tournament, Get #2 seed, Lose second round to Nevada
  • 2004-5 #20 MRI pre-tournament, Get #3 seed, Lose second round to Texas Tech
  • 2005-6 #31 MRI pre-tournament, Get #3 seed.
  • The only benefit they have is that they have actually fallen in the MRI over the last three seasons, which if you look at the only good season they had since the MRI, they might make the Sweet Sixteen. But more than the numbers, the scary thing is their performance of late.

    Anyone who watched any of the games in the West Coast Conference tournament saw Gonzaga consistently play down to the level of their opponents. It didn't matter how many points Adam Morrison scored. It didn't matter how big JP Batista and Derek Raivio came through. The fact was that the mighty Gonzaga was challenged every night. So what makes me so sure that Xavier won't challenge them, especially considering the run by the Musketeers in the Atlantic 10 tournament? The truth is I am not sure.

    Sure, Xavier took a big drop over the last month of the season. They lost their leading scorer, Brian Thornton. They had their point guard and senior leader, Dedrick Finn, dismissed from the team for a violation of team rules. They were in disarray. Still, they managed to get it together for the Atlantic 10 tournament and win four games straight. This game is not going to be about stopping Adam Morrison. This game is going to be about stopping JP Batista. If Justin Doellman and the other big men for the Musketeers can do that, Morrison will be all alone on the floor and will be much easier to take care of.

    So who am I picking? Despite all that, I have Gonzaga penciled in all the way to the Sweet Sixteen to meet UCLA. If they go out in the second round again this year, it wouldn't surprise me. If they lose in the first round to Xavier, it would surprise me a little, but not as much as it will everyone else.

    Last for now will be the No. 4 seeds. These are usually the teams that can cause the most damage to a bracket, being the most likely to knock out the No. 1 seeds later on in the Sweet Sixteen. This year, LSU, Illinois, Boston College, and Kansas, and taking that yoke on their backs. If you look at the teams, you have the makings of what could be next year's Final Four participants in two squads, Kansas and LSU. Both are young, both have inside strength, and both are getting the experience they need this year to make the run next year. That doesn't mean that neither has a shot to get their this season, it just more likely to come with another year of playing under their belts. That said, LSU should get by Iona with no problem and Kansas should survive Bradley.

    If there is any team that is more of an enigma, it could be the Braves, who can keep their nickname with an outstanding appeal to the NCAA. Bradley came from nowhere in the conference to put on a brilliant late season run and make it all the way to Conference Tournament finals. A month before the Missouri Valley Conference tournament, Bradley was an afterthought. Now, they are one of the final teams in and got what could be a favorable match-up. Remember that Bradley is a team with a lot of upperclassmen. They are big in the middle with Patrick O'Bryant and Marcellus Sommerville (see, I told you his story was yet to be told...). They have some shooters and an experienced guard who can distribute the ball in Daniel Ruffin.

    The experience of the Braves is countered by the youth, but dangerous youth, of the Jayhawks. Brandon Rush, Mario Chalmers, Julian Wright, these are the names that we should be paying attention to next year (as for a couple, it may be their last in college). I think this game will come down to how well Chalmers has really matured as the leader on the offensive side of the ball. He will be controlling the action for Kansas. They made it through to capture the Big XII title and that was a great boost to their confidence. They have experience against a bigger inside team because of their play against Texas and Oklahoma. They should be ready for this game.

    But again, they are young, and Bradley is hungry to show to that they were not incorrectly placed into the field. This may be yet another of those games, where if you get points for the seed that wins in an upset, you might want to take Bradley. They have what it takes to win in the tournament and Kansas or Bradley will have its hands full with Pittsburgh in the second round.

    As for Illinois and Boston College, you can move them both through with no problem. Illinois should take care of an Air Force squad which received what I think was a gift from the committee. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. Boston College is facing a Pacific team that knows how to win in the tournament and that could be trouble, but I think the Eagles learned a lot about themselves playing in the ACC tournament. After the terrible start to their first season in conference there, they righted the ship and almost took their inaugural season championship in the tournament. Don't fret on the size of Christian Maraker. Boston College should contain him well with Craig Smith and Jared Dudley helping John Oates down low.

    Did you get all that? A few potential upsets in the top four lines and some sleeper picks for you if you get bonus points. Stay tuned for lines five through eight where anything can and will happen.

    Posted by bmiraski at 8:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

    March 1, 2006

    Couch Musings - March 1st, 2006

    A few notes on the action last night and a look ahead at who can guarantee themselves a berth somewhere in the post-season with a win tonight.

    Posted by bmiraski at 12:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

    February 28, 2006

    Couch Musings - February 28th, 2006

    Conference tournaments in three leagues kick off tonight, setting up the conference championship games with the first automatic bids into the NCAA tournament. Here are a couple of thoughts before these games.

    Posted by bmiraski at 12:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

    January 20, 2006

    Couch Musings - January 20th, 2006

    The couch has been getting a lot of work this week. Here are five thoughts for you from the last few days.